The Wits Appraisal

Marcello M. | March 3, 2026

The Wits appraisal is one of the most useful complementary measurements for evaluating sagittal jaw relationships. While the ANB angle remains widely used, Wits was introduced to reduce some of its geometric limitations.

Simple in concept but powerful in interpretation, Wits provides an alternative way to assess the anteroposterior relationship between the maxilla and mandible.


What Is the Wits Appraisal?

The Wits appraisal measures the linear distance between two projected skeletal points on the functional occlusal plane:

  • Point A projected onto the occlusal plane (AO)
  • Point B projected onto the occlusal plane (BO)

The horizontal distance between AO and BO represents the sagittal discrepancy.


Typical Values

  • Male average: approximately −1 mm
  • Female average: approximately 0 mm
  • Positive values: skeletal Class II tendency
  • Negative values: skeletal Class III tendency

As with all cephalometric norms, these values are guidelines — not absolute diagnostic rules.


Why Was Wits Introduced?

The ANB angle is influenced by several geometric factors:

  • Cranial base length
  • Cranial base angle
  • Vertical growth pattern
  • Rotation of the jaws

Because ANB is angular and dependent on the SN plane, changes in cranial base orientation can distort sagittal interpretation.

The Wits appraisal was designed to minimize these influences by using the occlusal plane as a reference instead of the cranial base.


What the Wits Appraisal Does Well

  • Provides a linear measurement (in millimeters)
  • Less influenced by cranial base morphology than ANB
  • Useful when ANB appears inconsistent with clinical findings
  • Helpful in borderline surgical cases

In many situations, Wits can confirm or question the sagittal diagnosis suggested by ANB.


Clinical Example

A patient presents with an ANB of 5°, suggesting skeletal Class II. However, Wits measures only +1 mm.

Clinical examination shows mild convexity but balanced lower facial height.

In this case, the increased ANB may be influenced by vertical growth pattern or cranial base configuration, while Wits suggests a milder sagittal discrepancy.

The discrepancy between ANB and Wits provides diagnostic insight rather than confusion.


Limitations of the Wits Appraisal

Despite its advantages, Wits is not free from limitations:

  • Highly dependent on occlusal plane definition
  • Occlusal plane may vary due to dental compensation
  • Affected by orthodontic treatment or eruption stage
  • Less reliable in mixed dentition

Because the occlusal plane is a dental reference, any dental compensation can influence the measurement.


ANB vs Wits: Complementary, Not Competitive

The Wits appraisal should not replace ANB.

Instead, the two measurements are best interpreted together.

  • If both agree → diagnostic confidence increases
  • If they disagree → investigate vertical pattern, rotation, or compensation

Disagreement often reveals important skeletal dynamics.


The Role of Digital Cephalometry

Digital cephalometric software improves the reproducibility of Wits by standardizing occlusal plane construction and point projection.

Instant recalculation also allows clinicians to explore how slight changes in plane definition affect sagittal interpretation.


Conclusion

The Wits appraisal is a valuable sagittal indicator that complements angular measurements such as ANB.

By reducing cranial base influence and providing a linear perspective, it enhances diagnostic depth in everyday orthodontic practice.

Like all cephalometric values, Wits is not a rule — it is a tool. Its true power lies in thoughtful interpretation within the full clinical context.